Moses Maimon, “Again at home”, 1906. A Jewish soldier returned from the imperial war and he found out that his family perished in a massacre.

In the light of new trends in the Russian state genesis, questions arise that disturb the consciousness of the layman. Here the Great Pu signs a decree on the accession of new territories to the Russian Federation. Here a part of these territories immediately, without asking, goes back to Ukraine. Here the court herald Peskov voices a new doctrine of collecting lands, “We will take as much as we can, but we do not yet know how much it is. We will consult with the population of the territories.” At this time, the media space is actively discussing the hypothetical disintegration of Russia due to the collapse of the state administration mechanism, the signs of which are already evident, the same Kadyrov, for example, stating that Russia, they say, is great and rich, but there is no order, sorry. Therefore, he will take a slightly different path from the Russian state, he will not carry out mobilization, contrary to the law adopted by the State Duma.

On January 7, 1858, in Luzhki Village near Vilnius (at that time under the occupation of Russian Empire), Eliezer Ben-Yehuda was born, who is called the father of the modern Hebrew. He devoted his whole life to the revival of Hebrew, its development and enrichment: Ben-Yehuda created one of the first weeklies in Hebrew, he founded the Hebrew Language Committee, which later became the Hebrew Language Academy, and he began publishing the first complete dictionary of Hebrew.

In the Estonian city of Otepää, the Erzya National Congress, convened in exile due to the intensifying repressions in the Russian Federation, completed its work. The delegates, after heated discussions and disputes, adopted high-profile resolutions: on new goals and objectives of the national movement, which include the struggle for independence and the secession of the Erzya territories from the Russian Federation, the approval of the desired borders, as well as the key principles for building a new state entity.

In Moscow, the school №1568 principal reported a sixth grader who criticized the Russian flag at school and lessons called “The conversations about important things” to the police.

Listen to this allocution. Now the imperialists will scream that Ukrainians are using the topic of enslaved peoples. But then how can we literally call the way Moscow is using these very peoples?

By the way,Ukrainians have not ruined Shamil memorial even after February, 24, even after Dagestan has become the leading provider of corpses in this war. Why? Perhaps, because it is obvious for Ukrainians that Shamil would be with the people of Dagestan but not with Putin’s “mistresses” such as Melikov.

By starting this war, Russia has brought itself to the brink beyond which there is inevitable defeat. And mobilization will not change this. Russia has already lost the war. The question is what will be left after Russia. The plan is already in place. This opinion was expressed by Gleb Parfyonov, coordinator of the security direction of the Doctrine Center for Political Studies.

Moscow intends to block the protests by force methods.

The Rosgvardiya troops from other regions of Russia have already been introduced to Dagestan.

As local sources tell, the majority of Rosgvardiya are Russians as the goverment are not sure in the local marionettes’ trustworthyness.

Still Moscow does not hurry to send rosguardians to the front but wants to mobilise just the locals – the Avars, Kumyks, Dargins, Laks, Lesgins. For such peoples as the Rutuls, mobilising even a thousand of men means real death for the non-numerous nation.

Has everyone already heard the joke by Valery Zaluzhny, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine – “We’ve done away with the Russian professional army, it’s time to do away with their amateur army”? Watching the footage of Russian “mobilliziaki” (contemptuous and ironic of mobilized soldiers), Ukrainians assume that the Russian command expects the Armed Forces of Ukraine to die of laughter.

Now I am going to engage in a useless and pointless activity – repeating what has been said many times and repeated more than once, namely, telling adults not to try to hit themselves in the back of the head with the heel. It is very difficult, ridiculous, absurd and painful for the “acrobats” themselves. What do I have to say? And here’s the thing.

The independent outlet Kolokol XXI believes that the Caucasus will be the first in line for its freedom deserved by centuries of humiliation and genocide.

A murder of a military commissar, arson of a draft board, and a couple of policemen’s faces smashed during the meeting in Makhachkala were reported in Russia in the past 24 hours. It seems that the partial mobilization in Russia follows the plan. At least the military expert Oleksandr Kovalenko thinks so. Here is what he says about it. Last seven months, I was often asked if Putin would announce a mobilization. I’ve always replied that Putin is afraid of domestic detonations in society and that is why he would retard general mobilization as long as possible. In addition, you have to declare war in order to announce the mobilization.

The war correspondent and journalist Arkadiy Babchenko has numerously said that Kherson will become a new “Stalingrad” where the role of Paulus’ tank army will be played by russhist soldiers.

Still, there is one nuance: Paulus’ army was not prohibited to retreat. Though it was defeated, that was because of the headquarters’ mistakes and miscounts but not because they were just left as the orks are now being left to perish near Kherson.

For good reason the bloody marshal Zhukov is one of Putin’s idols.

Zhukov: Why should we give arms to those khokhols (Ukrainians)? Women will be get more of them.

Putin: Why should we give arms to those aborigens? Women will be get more of them.

According to “The History of the Russes” ( a chronicle of the early XVIII century) the Zaporizhzha Army colonel Ivan Bohun made this speech at the council in the hetman capital Chyhyryn in spring 1650. How topical do Bohun’s words remain now?

The popular journalist and civic activist Serhiy Smyrnov is telling about it.