“Take as much sovereignty as you can carry” is the famous phrase of Boris Yeltsin, sounded in 1990. However, did the peoples enslaved by Moscow really have a historical chance to gain independence ?
Today, the All-Tatar Public Center (recognized as extremist in the Russian Federation) sent an appeal to the deputies of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine with a request to support and vote for a resolution recognizing the state sovereignty and independence of Tatarstan.
It is believed that people in the national republics are not ready for the idea of independence, which means it is not worth doing something now, we should wait until their level of consciousness becomes high enough, and then raise the issue of decolonization. Although it is clear that this is a way to nowhere – after all, without knowing what independence is, without having such experience, people cannot begin to want it? Of course, one should influence the situation. What should be taken into account when you get down to business, the success of which does not depend on you, and the vast majority of the population, by inertia, will resist changes? The Free Nations League tells us about this using a very simple and witty example.
I was often struck by such a Russian national trait as uncleanliness. Ordinary household uncleanliness. Sometimes it is expressed in untidiness, more often in the disorganization of the everyday space around themselves, the habit of a Russian person to brush aside everything, in his opinion, “petty, insignificant”. As a result, everywhere one had to stumble upon inconvenience, the unsuitability of living conditions for normal work or normal rest.
At the beginning, the author wants to quote himself, one paragraph from the previous article, “The public – both those who identify themselves as Erzyan Mastor, and just decent people of the Republic of Mordovia of any nationality – will help the activist with the collection of money to pay a Jesuit fine, almost three times higher than her pension. After all, no heroism is needed here, even publicity is not needed, just silently transfer money in any way … Someone from the Erzya or representatives of other Finno-Ugric peoples of the Russian Federation needs to take over the organization of this event and conduct it carefully, thoughtfully, with safety net. With motivation “out of pity for an elderly person, a colleague who “made an unfortunate miscalculation.” There is nothing shameful here, such a wording is acceptable in the fight against the imperial leviathan, and no one has canceled military cunning. The main thing is to save the fighter who went on the attack.”
Who and why scares the world with the collapse of the Russian Federation? Why will the world actually benefit from this? Here is how the Forum of Free Peoples of Post-Russia answers these questions.
BashNatsPolit published a vision of the future structure of Bashkortostan proposed by a young Bashkir. The organization asks not to judge strictly, but to give your recommendations and advice on improving the program.
The fire of resistance is still burning in the Erzya people, the Erzya and Moksha have not yet been completely converted into “Mordovians” with an aim to turn them into ordinary “Russians” in the final stage. There are still intellectuals who, contrary to the state line, declare, “We are separate, we are original, we are not going to forget our language, customs and culture! The soul of our people requires freedom of expression, we will not be satisfied with folklore groups and exhibitions of applied folk art! We will fight.”
Dmitriy Lazarev, the judge of the Proletarsky District Court of Saransk, imposed a fine of 40 thousand rubles on Syres Bolyaen, the chief elder of the Erzya people. Idel.Realii talk about this.
Today, in the center of Rome, a protest against the Iranian and Russian totalitarian regimes was held, in which people from the Idel-Ural region also participated. Among those gathered were Iranians living in Italy, Muslims from other countries, Ukrainians and Italians.
“Why am I not guilty of anything, but I should be responsible?!” asks the majority of citizens of the Russian Federation. Here is how Oleksiy Khivrich, our subscriber, Ukrainian human rights activist answered this question.
Mobilization revealed for a Russian layman all the flaws in the Russian system, and they became obvious to everyone. With the beginning of mobilization, the system becomes so ragged and vulnerable that those acts of resistance that had no chance before become not only possible, but necessary, they are in demand and spread everywhere.