“Russian strike of retaliation, but not everything is so unequivocal.” How does it work?

“Russian strike of retaliation, but not everything is so unequivocal.” How does it work?

A few days or weeks before the strike, the area where the attack will take place is reconnoitered, it is explored what is out there and how effective this strike will be. Then one needs to wait until the enemy strikes somewhere or come up with such a strike. The reason is not important – it is important to state that there is such a reason.

Then to launch missiles. No matter how many there are, at least half or even most of them should hit civilians, and a certain percentage of missiles should hit a military facility. And then to make a statement, we hit the military facility, and they, the bastards, shot down our missiles and this happened. If they had not shot down the missiles, everything would have been fine.

So it turns out that they have three trump cards in the hands at once:

1. Terror of the civilian population of the enemy in order to demoralize him and force him to capitulate, if not the army, then the population – so that they would beg to surrender to the mercy of the enemy.

2. Before the international community there is some kind of “justification” and space for manipulation in order to create propaganda.

3. Their own bloodthirsty Z-herd is confident in its “power” and, seeing the suffering of civilians, thinks that they are about to crawl on their knees.

Video: Dnepr, Iskander missiles – one hit a residential high-rise building and one hit the Security Service of Ukraine building. The building of the Security Service of Ukraine was empty, since this is the most military facility, and everyone understood that sooner or later they would hit him.

This was known and understood in the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Therefore, the Z-Nazis are happy just when they hit a residential building, and they are not particularly interested in the building of the Security Service of Ukraine.


Leave a Reply